The Effects of Adding Reassurance Statements: Cancer Patients' Preferences for Phrases in End-of-Life Discussions

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Jun;57(6):1121-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.019. Epub 2019 Feb 25.

Abstract

Context: When discussing end-of-life issues with cancer patients, the addition of reassurance statements is considered helpful. However, patients' preferences for such statements have not been systematically demonstrated.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to clarify if phrases with additional reassurance statements would be more preferable to phrases without them and explore variables associated with patients' preferences.

Methods: In a cross-sectional survey, 412 cancer patients assessed their own preferences for phrases with/without additional statements using a six-point scale (1 = not at all preferable; 6 = very preferable). These included the statements of "hope for the best and prepare for the worst" ("hope/prepare") when discussing prognosis; symptom palliation when discussing code status; and specific goals, continuity of care, and nonabandonment when discussing hospice referral. We evaluated demographic data and the coping style and conducted multivariate regression analysis.

Results: Compared with the phrase of life expectancy (i.e., median + typical range) alone [mean (SD), 3.5 (1.2); 95% CI, 3.4-3.6], the phrase with the additional "hope/prepare" statement was more preferable [3.8 (1.4); 3.7-3.9]. Compared with the phrase of do-not-resuscitate alone (3.1(1.3); 3.0-3.3), the phrase with the additional statement of symptom palliation was more preferable [3.9 (1.3); 3.7-4.0]. Compared with the phrase of hospice referral alone [3.4 (1.2); 3.3-3.5], phrases with the addition of a specific goal [3.9 (1.0); 3.8-4.0], specific goal and continuity (4.4(1.0); 4.3-4.5), and specific goal, continuity, and nonabandonment [4.8 (1.2); 4.7-4.9] were more preferable. In multivariate analyses, task-oriented coping was significantly correlated with preferences for phrases including additional reassurance statements.

Conclusion: Cancer patients systematically preferred reassurance statements. In end-of-life discussions, especially with patients with task-oriented coping, clinicians may provide additional reassurance statements.

Keywords: Communication; do-not-resuscitate; hospice referral; prognostic disclosure.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Continuity of Patient Care
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Hospices
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Palliative Care
  • Patient Preference
  • Referral and Consultation
  • Refusal to Treat
  • Resuscitation Orders
  • Terminal Care / methods*