The SUMAMOS EXCELENCIA Project

J Adv Nurs. 2019 Jul;75(7):1575-1584. doi: 10.1111/jan.13988. Epub 2019 Apr 2.

Abstract

Aim: The gap between research and clinical practice leads to inconsistent decision-making and clinical audits are an effective way of improving the implementation of best practice. Our aim is to assess the effectiveness of a model that implements evidence-based recommendations for patient outcomes and healthcare quality.

Design: National quasi-experimental, multicentre, before and after study.

Methods: This study focuses on patients attending primary care and hospital care units and associated socio-healthcare services. It uses the Joanna Brigg's Institute Getting Research into Practice model, which improves processes by referring to prior baseline clinical audits. The variables are process and outcome criteria for pain, urinary incontinence, and fall prevention, with data collection at baseline and key points over 12 months drawn from clinical histories and records. Project funding was received from the Spanish Strategic Health Action in November 2014.

Discussion: The project results will provide knowledge on the effectiveness of the Getting Research into Practice model, to apply evidence-based recommendations for the detection and management of pain, urinary incontinence, and fall prevention. It will also establish whether using research results, based on clinical audits and situation analysis, is effective for implementing evidence-based recommendations and improving patients' health.

Impact: This nationwide Spanish project aims to detect and prevent high-prevalence healthcare problems, namely pain in patients at any age and falls and urinary incontinence in people aged 65 and over. Tailoring clinical practice to evidence-based recommendations will reduce unjustified clinical variations in providing healthcare services. Clinical Trial ID: NCT03725774.

目的: 研究与临床实践之间的差距导致决策出现分歧,临床审计是改进实施最佳实践的有效方法。我们的目标对一个模型的有效性进行评估,该模型能给患者的治疗结果和医疗质量提供有据可循的建议。 设计: 国家准实验、多中心,前后对照研究。 方法: 本研究的研究对象为接受初级护理和医院护理单位护理及相关社会保健服务的患者。本研究使用了Joanna Brigg研究所的研究应用于实践模型,该模型通过参考之前的基线临床审计使实验过程得到了改善。选用疼痛、尿失禁和跌倒预防的过程和结果标准作为实验变量,并从临床历史和记录中进行为期12个月的基线和关键点的数据收集。项目资金由西班牙战略卫生行动营于2014年11月进行赞助。 讨论: 本项目的结果将为研究应用于实践模型的有效性提供理论知识,从而为疼痛、尿失禁和跌倒预防的检测与管理给出有据可循的建议。 它还将确定在临床审计和情况分析的基础上使用研究结果是否有效地执行基于证据的建议和改善患者的健康。 影响: 该西班牙全国性项目旨在检测和预防高发的健康问题,即所有年龄层次的疼痛以及65岁及以上人群的跌倒和尿失禁疼痛。根据有据可循的建议对临床实践进行调整将减少在提供医疗服务时所产生的不合理的临床差异。.

Keywords: clinical audits; clinical practice; evidence-based medicine; falls; healthcare quality; healthcare services; nursing; pain; patient outcomes; urinary incontinence.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Accidental Falls / prevention & control
  • Aged
  • Clinical Audit
  • Decision Making
  • Humans
  • Pain Management / standards
  • Quality of Health Care*
  • Spain
  • Urinary Incontinence / prevention & control

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT03725774