New endoscopic ultrasonography criteria for malignant lymphadenopathy based on inter-rater agreement

PLoS One. 2019 Feb 22;14(2):e0212427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212427. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Background and aims: Various studies have been previously conducted on the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy as benign or malignant, but the results vary. These studies did not describe the inter-rater agreement on the EUS features of lymphadenopathy. In this study, we evaluate the inter-rater agreement on EUS features and propose EUS diagnostic norms for lymphadenopathy based on inter-rater agreement.

Method: A total of 68 lymph nodes subjected to EUS-fine needle aspiration (FNA) were reviewed by five endoscopic experts. The EUS features evaluated lymph node size, shape, border, margin, echogenicity, homogeneity, and the hilum of the lymph node. Inter-rater agreement (multi-rater kappa statics) was performed. We established new criteria using results with a high degree of inter-rater agreement from EUS features and compared them with the former criteria.

Result: There was a moderate agreement on shape, kappa (K) = 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34-0.54), and fair agreement on echogenicity, homogeneity, border, and hilum of the lymph node, K (95% CI) = 0.33 (0.17-0.38), 0.34 (0.26-0.35), 0.22 (0.21-0.31), and 0.22 (0.11-0.26), respectively. This resulted in the establishment of new EUS diagnostic criteria using shape, long axis > 20 mm and short axis > 10 mm. New criteria were superior to old criteria (area under the curve 0.82 vs 0.52, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: EUS diagnostic criteria for lymphadenopathy based on inter-rater agreement were more accurate than old criteria. This result will be useful for the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy.

MeSH terms

  • Abdominal Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Biopsy, Fine-Needle
  • Endosonography / methods*
  • Endosonography / standards
  • Endosonography / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lymphadenopathy / diagnostic imaging*
  • Male
  • Mediastinal Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging
  • Middle Aged
  • Observer Variation
  • Retrospective Studies

Associated data

  • figshare/10.6084/m9.figshare.7355861.v1
  • figshare/10.6084/m9.figshare.7409549.v1

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.