Lymphocytic hypophysitis is characterized by an extensive infiltration of lymphocytic cells. Pituitary biopsy is the gold diagnostic standard for lymphocytic hypophysitis but the disease occurs with moderate or without pituitary enlargement. The role of antipituitary antibodies (APA) in autoimmune hypophysitis is still discussed due to various methodological difficulties. Indirect immunofluorescence, a widely employed method to detect APA at this time produces highly variable results due to the use of human or animal pituitary substrates. For many years the authors have conducted a re-evaluation of APA by immunofluorescence in patients with other autoimmune diseases and in patients with apparently idiopathic hypopituitarism, using pituitary from young baboons as substrate but considering a predetermined cut-off of the titer and immunofluorescence pattern. This procedure allowed us to find out those with autoimmune pituitary impairment and to foresee the kind of future hypopituitarism in those with pituitary function still normal. Moreover, in APA positive patients, the use of a second step of a double immunofluorescence method allowed identification of the pituitary cells targeted by APA, verifying the correspondence with the kind of hypopituitarism, also when present in subclinical stage. However, to carry out an international workshop comparing the detection of APA by immunofluorescence using different substrates could contribute to verify the best choice to improve the sensitivity and specificity of this method.
Keywords: IgG4 plasmacytic hypophysitis; antipituitary antibodies; autoimmune hypophysitis; lymphocytic hypophysitis.