Modulus testing methods under various test conditions have a large influence on modulus test results, which hinders the accurate evaluation of the stiffness of asphalt mixtures. In order to decrease the uncertainty in the stiffness characteristics of asphalt mixtures under various stress states, the traditional unconfined compression test, direct tensile test, and the synchronous test method, based on the indirect tension and four-point bending tests, were carried out for different loading frequencies. Results showed that modulus test results were highly sensitive to the shape, size, and stress state of the specimen. Additionally, existing modulus characteristics did not reduce these differences. There is a certain correlation between the elastic modulus ratio and the frequency ratio for asphalt under multiple stress states. The modulus, under multiple stress states, was processed using min⁻max normalization. Then, the standardization model for tensile and compressive characteristics of asphalt under diverse stress states was established based on the sample preparation, modulus ratio variations, and loading frequency ratio. A method for deriving other moduli from one modulus was realized. It is difficult to evaluate the stiffness performance in diverse stress states for asphalt by only using conventional compressive and tensile tests. However, taking into account the effects of stress states and loading frequencies, standardized models can be used to reduce or even eliminate these effects. The model realizes the unification of different modulus test results, and provides a theoretical, methodological, and technical basis for objectively evaluating moduli.
Keywords: asphalt mixture; compressive moduli; four-point bending moduli; indirect tensile moduli; modulus test; road engineering; standardized; synchronous test method; tensile moduli.