Common garden comparisons confirm inherited differences in sensitivity to climate change between forest tree species

PeerJ. 2019 Jan 15:7:e6213. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6213. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

The natural distribution, habitat, growth and evolutionary history of tree species are strongly dependent on ecological and genetic processes in ecosystems subject to fluctuating climatic conditions, but there have been few experimental comparisons of sensitivity between species. We compared the responses of two broadleaved tree species (Fagus sylvatica and Quercus petraea) and two conifer tree species (Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies) to climatic transfers by fitting models containing the same climatic variables. We used published data from European provenance test networks to model the responses of individual populations nested within species. A mixed model approach was applied to develop a response function for tree height over climatic transfer distance, taking into account the climatic conditions at both the seed source and the test location. The two broadleaved species had flat climatic response curves, indicating high levels of plasticity in populations, facilitating adaptation to a broader range of environments, and conferring a high potential for resilience in the face of climatic change. By contrast, the two conifer species had response curves with more pronounced slopes, indicating a lower resilience to climate change. This finding may reflect stronger genetic clines in P. sylvestris and P. abies, which constrain their climate responses to narrower climatic ranges. The response functions had maxima that deviated from the expected maximum productivity in the climate of provenance towards cooler/moister climate conditions, which we interpreted as an adaptation lag. Unilateral, linear regression analyses following transfer to warmer and drier sites confirmed a decline in productivity, predictive of the likely impact of ongoing climate change on forest populations. The responses to mimicked climate change evaluated here are of considerable interest for forestry and ecology, supporting projections of expected performance based on "real-time" field data.

Keywords: Assisted migration; Climatic change; Climatic transfer distance; Fagus sylvatica; Forest decline; Mixed model; Picea abies; Pinus sylvestris; Quercus petraea; Response function.

Grants and funding

Funding was provided by the European Union (FORGER grant 289119 “Towards the sustainable management for forest genetic resources in Europe” to Antoine Kremer and Csaba Mátyás, and ERC TREEPEACE Advanced Grant 339728 to Antoine Kremer). This work started while Cuauhtémoc Sáenz-Romero was on a sabbatical stay at the Institut national de la recherche agronomique - unité Mixte de Recherches Biodiversité, Gènes et Communautés (INRA-BIOGECO), Cestas, France, supported by a fellowship from the Mexican Council of Science and Technology (CONACyT, grant 232838) and from the Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo; also, Cuauhtémoc Sáenz-Romero conducted an academic visit funded by FORGER to the University of West Hungary. Csaba Mátyás, Anikó Kóczán-Horvath, László Nagy and Éva Újvári-Jármay were partly supported by the joint national-EU research project “VKSZ_12-1-2013-0034- Agrárklima.2” in Hungary. The Consejo de Ciencia y Tecnología del Estado de Durango, (COCYTED), the LXVII Legislature of the State of Durango, and the Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, México, through Christian Wehenkel, sponsored this publication after part of their results were presented at the Durango 2018 International Forest Forum, Durango, Dgo., México, 25-28 April, 2018. There was no additional external funding received for this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.