Potential of biochar filters for onsite wastewater treatment: Effects of active and inactive biofilms on adsorption of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in laboratory column experiments

Environ Pollut. 2019 Apr:247:155-164. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.032. Epub 2019 Jan 14.

Abstract

This study investigated the potential of biochar filters as a replacement for, or complement to, sand filters for removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) from wastewater in on-site wastewater treatment systems (OWTSs). Concentrations and removal of nine perfluoroalkyl carboxylates (PFCAs; C3-11) and three perfluoroalkane sulfonates (PFSAs; C4, 6, 8) and one perfluorooctanesulfonamide (FOSA; C8) were investigated over 22 weeks in four treatments with column filters: biochar (BC) without biofilm (BC-no-biofilm), biochar with active biofilm (BC-active-biofilm), biochar with inactive biofilm (BC-inactive-biofilm) and sand with active biofilm (Sand-active-biofilm). The filters were operated under hydraulic loading (50 L m-2 day-1) to mimic the loading rate in on-site filtration beds. The initial concentrations of the ΣPFASs in the influent were in the range of 1500-4900 ng L-1. In BC-no-biofilm, the removal efficiency (20-60%) and adsorption capacity (0-88 ng ΣPFASs g-1 BC) of short-chain PFCAs (C3-6) and PFSA (C4) was low, whereas the removal efficiency (90-99%) and the adsorption capacity (73-168 ng g-1) was high for C7-C11 PFCAs, C6, C8 PFSAs and FOSA. The relative removal was generally lower for C3-9 PFCAs and C4, C6, C8 PFSAs using BC-active-biofilm and BC-inactive-biofilm compared with BC-no-biofilm. This can be explained by the presence of biofilm and solids in BC-active-biofilm and the presence of wastewater solids in BC-inactive-biofilm, which decreased the availability and number of adsorption sites for PFASs compared with BC-no-biofilm. On the other hand, inactivation of the biofilm resulted in lower removal efficiencies for C5-11 PFCAs, C4, C6, C8 PFSAs and FOSA, probably because the biofilm degraded organic matter and thus increased the availability and number of adsorption sites compared with BC-inactive-biofilm. Sand-active-biofilm showed poor removal (0-70%) for all PFASs except FOSA (90%) and its adsorption capacity was low (0.0-7.5 ng g-1). In general, for all biochar treatments, shorter-chain PFASs were more resistant to removal than longer-chain PFASs. In addition, C4, C6 and C8 PFSAs showed 10-30%, 10-50% and 20-30% higher average removal efficiency, respectively, than PFCAs with corresponding perfluoroalkyl chain length. In conclusion, biochar is a promising filter medium for removal of PFASs in OWTSs, especially for PFASs with a perfluorocarbon chain longer than C6.

Keywords: Active biofilm; Adsorption; Biochar filters; Biodegradation; Inactive biofilm; On-site wastewater treatment; PFASs.

MeSH terms

  • Adsorption
  • Alkanesulfonates
  • Biofilms
  • Carboxylic Acids
  • Charcoal / chemistry*
  • Filtration
  • Fluorocarbons
  • Sulfonamides
  • Waste Disposal, Fluid / methods*
  • Wastewater / chemistry*
  • Water Pollutants, Chemical / analysis*

Substances

  • Alkanesulfonates
  • Carboxylic Acids
  • Fluorocarbons
  • Sulfonamides
  • Waste Water
  • Water Pollutants, Chemical
  • biochar
  • Charcoal
  • perfluorooctanesulfonamide