Improving Benefit-harm Assessment of Therapies from the Patient Perspective: OMERACT Premeeting Toward Consensus on Core Sets for Randomized Controlled Trials

J Rheumatol. 2019 Aug;46(8):1053-1058. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.181123. Epub 2019 Jan 15.

Abstract

Objective: Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) convened a premeeting in 2018 to bring together patients, regulators, researchers, clinicians, and consumers to build upon previous OMERACT drug safety work, with patients fully engaged throughout all phases.

Methods: Day 1 included a brief introduction to the history of OMERACT and methodology, and an overview of current efforts within and outside OMERACT to identify patient-reported medication safety concerns. On Day 2, two working groups presented results; after each, breakout groups were assembled to discuss findings.

Results: Five themes pertaining to drug safety measurement emerged.

Conclusion: Current approaches have failed to include data from the patient's perspective. A better understanding of how individuals with rheumatic diseases view potential benefits and harms of therapies is essential.

Keywords: CLINICAL TRIALS; DISEASE-MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUGS; OMERACT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RISK ASSESSMENT.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Antirheumatic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Humans
  • Patient Satisfaction*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic*
  • Rheumatic Diseases / drug therapy*
  • Risk Assessment
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antirheumatic Agents