The effects of protective footwear on spine control and lifting mechanics

Appl Ergon. 2019 Apr:76:122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.12.009. Epub 2018 Dec 24.

Abstract

Manual materials handling is often performed in hazardous environments where protective footwear must be worn; however, workers can wear different types of footwear depending on the hazards present. Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate how three-dimensional lifting mechanics and trunk local dynamic stability are affected by different types of protective footwear (i.e. steel-toed shoes (unlaced boot), steel-toed boots (work boot), and steel-toed boots with a metatarsal guard (MET)). Twelve males and twelve females performed a repetitive lifting task at 10% of their maximum lifting effort, under three randomized footwear conditions. Footwear type influenced ankle range of motion (ROM). The work boot condition reduced ankle sagittal ROM (p = 0.007) and the MET condition reduced ankle ROM in the sagittal (p = 0.004), frontal (p = 0.001) and transverse (p = 0.003) planes. Despite these differences at the ankle, no other changes in participant lifting mechanics were observed.

Keywords: Footwear; Kinematics; Local dynamic stability.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Ankle Joint / physiology*
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lifting*
  • Male
  • Protective Clothing
  • Random Allocation
  • Range of Motion, Articular
  • Shoes*
  • Spine / physiology*
  • Torso / physiology*
  • Young Adult