Effect of length of time from diagnosis to treatment on colorectal cancer survival: A population-based study

PLoS One. 2019 Jan 14;14(1):e0210465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210465. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Evidence is limited regarding the effect of diagnosis-to-treatment interval (DTI) on the survival of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. In addition, previous studies on treatment delay and CRC survival have largely grouped patients from all stages (I-IV) into one cohort. Our study provides analysis on each stage individually. We conducted a retrospective cohort study with 39,000 newly diagnosed CRC patients obtained from the Taiwan Cancer Registry Database from 2004-2010 to examine the effect of DTIs on overall survival. DTIs were divided into 3 groups: ≤ 30 days (36,115 patients, 90.5% of study patients), 31-150 days (2,533, 6.4%), and ≥ 151 days (1,252, 3.15%). Risk of death was increased for DTI 31-150 days (hazard ratio 1.51; 95% confidence interval 1.43-1.59) and DTI ≥ 151 days (1.64; 1.54-1.76) compared to DTI ≤ 30. This risk was consistent across all cancer stages. Additional factors that increased risk of death include male gender, age >75, Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥7, other catastrophic illnesses, lack of multidisciplinary team involvement, and treatment in a low volume center. From these results, we advise that the DTI for all CRC patients, regardless of cancer staging, should be 30 days or less.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Area Under Curve
  • Cohort Studies
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / epidemiology
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • ROC Curve
  • Survival Analysis
  • Time Factors

Grants and funding

This study was supported by grants (MOST 104-2410-H-039 -002 to WCT; ASIA104-CMUH-17 to PTK) from the Ministry of Science and Technology (https://www.most.gov.tw/) and China Medical University (http://www.cmu.edu.tw/) and Asia University (http://www.asia.edu.tw/EN/), Taiwan. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.