Imaging utilization affects negative appendectomy rates in appendicitis: An ACS-NSQIP study

Am J Surg. 2019 Jun;217(6):1094-1098. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.12.072. Epub 2019 Jan 3.

Abstract

Background: Negative appendectomy rates (NAR) historically ranged from 15 to 25%, but have decreased recently.

Methods: Using the 2016 ACS-NSQIP database, we identified patients who underwent appendectomies for appendicitis. Patients with and without appendicitis on pathology were compared. Multivariate analysis was used to identify predictors of negative appendectomies.

Results: 11,841 patients underwent appendectomies, with a NAR of 4.5%. Utilization rates of US, CT and MRI were 14.9%, 86.1%, and 1.1%. NAR's of US, CT, and MRI were 9.7%, 2.5%, and 7.1%, and 19.2% for patients without imaging. An ultrasound consistent with appendicitis has a NAR of 4.8%; adding a CT decreases it to 0.6%. Predictors of NA include females, smoking, no imaging, and ultrasounds. Factors with lower odds of NA include leukocytosis, sepsis, and CTs.

Conclusions: The NAR in the 2016 ACS-NSQIP population is 4.5%. CTs are the most frequently used imaging modality and have the lowest NAR. Obtaining a CT in addition to an ultrasound is associated with lower NAR. This should be further explored with a cost-benefit analysis between multiple imaging studies versus negative appendectomies.

Keywords: Appendicitis; Imaging utilization; NSQIP; Negative appendectomy.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Appendectomy / statistics & numerical data*
  • Appendicitis / diagnostic imaging*
  • Appendicitis / surgery
  • Databases, Factual
  • Diagnostic Errors / prevention & control
  • Diagnostic Errors / statistics & numerical data*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / statistics & numerical data
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians' / statistics & numerical data*
  • Procedures and Techniques Utilization / statistics & numerical data*
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / statistics & numerical data
  • Ultrasonography / statistics & numerical data
  • United States
  • Unnecessary Procedures / statistics & numerical data*