Commentary: EPA's proposed expansion of dose-response analysis is a positive step towards improving its ecological risk assessment

Environ Pollut. 2019 Mar:246:566-570. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.046. Epub 2018 Dec 18.

Abstract

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) has recently proposed changes to strengthen the transparency of its pivotal regulatory science policy and procedures. In this context, the US EPA aims to enhance the transparency of dose-response data and models, proposing to consider for the first time non-linear biphasic dose-response models. While the proposed changes have the potential to lead to markedly improved ecological risk assessment compared to past and current approaches, we believe there remain open issues for improving the quality of ecological risk assessment, such as the consideration of adaptive, dynamic and interactive effects. Improved risk assessment including adaptive and dynamic non-linear models (beyond classic threshold models) can enhance the quality of regulatory decisions and the protection of ecological health. We suggest that other countries consider adopting a similar scientific-regulatory posture with respect to dose-response modeling via the inclusion of non-linear biphasic models, that incorporate the dynamic potential of biological systems to adapt (i.e., enhancing positive biological endpoints) or maladapt to low levels of stressor agents.

Keywords: Dose-response; Hormesis; Non-linear response; Regulation; Risk assessment.

MeSH terms

  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Ecology / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Ecology / methods*
  • Ecology / statistics & numerical data
  • Government Regulation*
  • Humans
  • Nonlinear Dynamics
  • Risk Assessment / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Risk Assessment / methods*
  • Risk Assessment / statistics & numerical data
  • United States
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency