Tests for paired count outcomes

Gen Psychiatr. 2018 Sep 8;31(1):e100004. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2018-100004. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

For moderate to large sample sizes, all tests yielded pvalues close to the nominal, except when models were misspecified. The signed-rank test generally had the lowest power. Within the current context of count outcomes, the signed-rank test shows subpar power when compared with tests that are contrasted based on full data, such as the GEE. Parametric models for count outcomes such as the GLMM with a Poisson for marginal count outcomes are quite sensitive to departures from assumed parametric models. There is some small bias for all the asymptotic tests, that is, the signed-ranktest, GLMM and GEE, especially for small sample sizes. Resampling methods such as permutation can help alleviate this.

Keywords: analytical, diagnostic and therapeutic; biostatistics; epidemiologic methods; investigative techniques; statistics as topic.