Morphologic Factors Related to Repair Outcomes for Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears: A Minimum 2-Year Retrospective Comparison Study

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes and repair integrity after en masse transosseous-equivalent suture bridge repair for delaminated rotator cuff tears and to analyze the morphologic factors related to clinical outcomes and repair integrity.

Methods: This study included 99 patients who underwent the technique of en masse transosseous-equivalent suture bridge repair for delaminated rotator cuff tears. Morphologic factors were estimated using magnetic resonance imaging, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the University of California, Los Angeles score; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; and Constant shoulder score. The morphologic factors included the shape of delamination, retraction length of the bursal and articular layers, gap distance between the layers, and length of the intrasubstance cleavage. According to follow-up magnetic resonance imaging, cases were categorized into the intact or retear group. The morphologic factors were compared between the 2 groups, including the correlation between the morphologic factors and postoperative outcomes.

Results: Retears occurred in 26 of 99 cases (26%). In both the intact and retear groups, the University of California, Los Angeles, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Constant scores improved postoperatively (P < .0001). The most common delamination shape was that of a more retracted articular layer in retears. We found no differences in retears in terms of the retraction length of the bursal layer, gap distance, and length of the intrasubstance cleavage. However, the retraction length of the articular layer differed significantly between the groups (P < .0001). No correlation between the morphologic factors and clinical outcomes was found.

Conclusions: Arthroscopic en masse transosseous-equivalent suture bridge repair is a useful technique in delaminated tears to achieve optimal repair outcomes. In addition, although there was no correlation between the morphologic factors and postoperative clinical outcomes, the retraction length of the articular layer was identified as a significant factor influencing repair integrity. We recommend emphasizing the reduction of tension within the articular layer during the repair procedure.

Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparison study.