Clinical, dietary and demographic characteristics interfering on quality of life of cancer patients

Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2018 Nov 29;16(4):eAO4368. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2018AO4368.
[Article in English, Portuguese]

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the dietary intake of cancer patients and its relation with clinical and demographic characteristics, and to assess the contribution of dietary intake, appetite/symptoms and clinical and demographic characteristics to their quality of life.

Methods: The consumption of energy and macronutrients of patients was estimated. The relation between dietary intake and clinical and demographic characteristics was evaluated by analysis of variance. The intake of energy and macronutrient of the patients was compared to the nutritional recommendations using 95% confidence interval. The Cancer Appetite and Symptom Questionnaire (CASQ) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC QLQ C-30) were used to assess appetite/symptoms and quality of life, respectively. The psychometric properties of the instruments were estimated. A structural equation model was prepared.

Results: In this study, 772 cancer patients (63.1% women) participated. There was a significant relation between dietary intake and work activity, economic class, specialty field of cancer, type of treatment and nutritional status. Patients' energy and macronutrients intake was below recommended values. Both CASQ and EORTC QLQ C-30 were refined to fit the data. In the structural model, impaired appetite, more symptoms, presence of metastasis, being female and of higher economic classes were characteristics that significantly contributed to interfering in patients' quality of life.

Conclusion: The dietary intake of oncology patients did not reach the recommended values. Different characteristics impacted on quality of life of patients and should be considered in clinical and epidemiological protocols.

Objetivo: Estimar a ingestão dietética de pacientes com câncer e sua relação com características clínicas e demográficas, além de verificar a contribuição da ingestão dietética, apetite/sintomas e características clínicas e demográficas para a qualidade de vida deles.

Métodos: Foi estimado o consumo de energia e de macronutrientes. A relação entre ingestão dietética e características clínicas e demográficas foi avaliada pela análise de variância. A ingestão de energia e macronutrientes dos pacientes foi comparada com a necessidade nutricional, utilizando intervalo de confiança de 95%. O Cancer Appetite and Symptom Questionnaire (CASQ) e o European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC QLQ C-30) foram utilizados para avaliar apetite/sintomas e qualidade de vida, respectivamente. As propriedades psicométricas dos instrumentos foram estimadas. Elaborou-se modelo de equações estruturais.

Resultados: Participaram do estudo 772 pacientes oncológicos (63,1% mulheres). Observou-se relação significativa entre ingestão dietética e atividade laboral, classe econômica, especialidade do diagnóstico, tipo de tratamento e estado nutricional. O consumo de energia e macronutrientes dos pacientes esteve abaixo do recomendado. Tanto o CASQ quando o EORTC QLQ C-30 foram refinados para bom ajustamento aos dados. No modelo estrutural, comprometimento do apetite, maior acometimento por sintomas, presença de metástase, ser mulher e pertencer às classes econômicas mais altas foram características que contribuíram significativamente para o comprometimento da qualidade de vida dos pacientes oncológicos.

Conclusão: A ingestão dietética dos pacientes oncológicos não atingiu os níveis recomendados. Diferentes características impactaram na qualidade de vida dos pacientes e devem ser consideradas em protocolos clínicos e epidemiológicos.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Appetite
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Eating* / psychology
  • Energy Intake
  • Feeding Behavior / psychology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasms / psychology*
  • Neoplasms / therapy
  • Nutrients
  • Nutritional Status*
  • Quality of Life*
  • Sex Factors
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Substances

  • Nutrients