Multiple routes to mind wandering: Predicting mind wandering with resource theories

Conscious Cogn. 2019 Jan:67:26-43. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

Abstract

Three experiments examine individual (attentional capacity) and task-related characteristics leading to mind wandering, and the effect of mind wandering on task performance. Drawing on resource theories, we tested interactive nonlinear effects of these predictors, manipulating task demand using math tests of varying difficulty (Exp 1: N = 143, three levels between-subjects; Exp 2: N = 59, three levels within-subjects; Exp 3: N = 133, four levels within-subjects). Results confirmed that mind wandering was most frequent during extreme task demand levels, although the effect varied somewhat between experiments. Additionally, results from Experiment 3 and an integrated analysis demonstrated that people with relatively higher attentional capacity were less likely to mind wander as task demand increased. Moreover, mind wandering was more detrimental to performance as task demand increased across all experiments. Our findings build on past research by demonstrating the importance of accounting for interactions and nonlinear effects of task demand and attentional capacity in mind wandering research.

Keywords: Attention; Mind wandering; Resource theory; Task complexity; Working memory.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Attention / physiology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Memory, Short-Term / physiology*
  • Psychological Theory
  • Thinking / physiology*
  • Young Adult