Influence of Type of Fixation and Other Characteristics on Outcome after Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 May:57:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

Abstract

Background: Endovascular treatment nowadays represents a valuable option in the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs). The aim of this study is to evaluate a 15-year, single-center experience with endovascular treatment of rAAAs and the role of the type of fixation in outcome.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive hemodynamically stable and unstable patients with a diagnosed rAAA treated at this hospital with an endovascular procedure between December 1999 and January 2015 was conducted. Patients with symptomatic aneurysms and impending ruptures were excluded. Predictive factors of immediate and overall major complications and survival were investigated. Study end points included technical and clinical success, mortality, and major adverse events.

Results: This study included 142 patients. Technical success was 97.1% within 30 days, 60 major adverse events were reported in 43 patients (30.3%), including 40 deaths (28.2%). Clinical success at 30 days was 59.9%. Predictive factors of 30-day mortality were chronic renal disease (odds ratio [OR] 3.44, P = 0.006), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 2.42, P = 0.032), hemodynamic instability at presentation (OR 4.57, P = 0.001), and the use of an aortic balloon (OR 23.4, P < 0.001). The use of local anesthesia (OR 0.38, P = 0.017) had a protective influence. One-year survival was 52%. At a median follow-up of 44 months (range 0.5-152), overall survival was 39% (95% CI 30-48), with a median overall survival of 13 month (95% CI 6-36). Five-year survival was 23%. Predictive factors of long-term mortality were advanced age (>85 years) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.0, P = 0.002), hemodynamic instability at admission (HR 1.90, P = 0.005), and the use of an aortic balloon (HR 4.56, P < 0.001). The implantation of an anatomically fixated (AFIX) device was found to be protective against mortality (OR 0.41, P = 0.011).

Conclusions: In this series, satisfactory rates of complications and survival were observed after endovascular repair of rAAAs. In addition to the well-known predictors of outcome, the type of fixation also seems to play a significant role, and the AFIX device was associated with improved longer term survival when its use was deemed feasible.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / diagnostic imaging
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / mortality
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / physiopathology
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / surgery*
  • Aortic Rupture / diagnostic imaging
  • Aortic Rupture / mortality
  • Aortic Rupture / physiopathology
  • Aortic Rupture / surgery*
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation* / adverse effects
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation* / instrumentation
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation* / mortality
  • Endovascular Procedures* / adverse effects
  • Endovascular Procedures* / instrumentation
  • Endovascular Procedures* / mortality
  • Female
  • Hemodynamics
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Stents
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome