Dichotomization of the new revised international prognostic scoring system for a better clinical stratification of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

Leuk Lymphoma. 2019 Jun;60(6):1522-1527. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2018.1542151. Epub 2018 Nov 30.

Abstract

In clinical practice, patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are usually classified in low or high-risk groups to take therapeutic decisions, conservative for low-risk, whereas active for high-risk. Nevertheless, in the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) is not well stated which patients are low or high-risk. This study was aimed to ascertain in 364 MDS patients which IPSS-R threshold better dichotomized in low vs. high-risk. The best dichotomization was obtained with an IPSS-R cut-point of 3. Accordingly, 68% patients were classified as low-risk (median OS, 61.3 months) and 32% as high-risk MDS (median OS, 13.9 months) (p < .001). Interestingly, the intermediate IPSS-R risk patients presented an OS more related to the high IPSS-R than to the low IPSS-R risk group. In conclusion, an IPSS-R cut-point of 3 led to a meaningful stratification in low and high-risk that can be helpful for the clinical management of MDS patients.

Keywords: IPSS; IPSS-R; Myelodysplastic syndromes; international prognostic scoring system; revised international prognostic scoring system.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Clinical Decision-Making / methods*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Biological*
  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes / mortality
  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes / therapy*
  • Patient Selection*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prognosis
  • ROC Curve
  • Reference Values
  • Research Design
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment / methods
  • Risk Factors
  • Young Adult