Classification of the glioma grading using radiomics analysis

PeerJ. 2018 Nov 22:6:e5982. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5982. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Background: Grading of gliomas is critical information related to prognosis and survival. We aimed to apply a radiomics approach using various machine learning classifiers to determine the glioma grading.

Methods: We considered 285 (high grade n = 210, low grade n = 75) cases obtained from the Brain Tumor Segmentation 2017 Challenge. Manual annotations of enhancing tumors, non-enhancing tumors, necrosis, and edema were provided by the database. Each case was multi-modal with T1-weighted, T1-contrast enhanced, T2-weighted, and FLAIR images. A five-fold cross validation was adopted to separate the training and test data. A total of 468 radiomics features were calculated for three types of regions of interest. The minimum redundancy maximum relevance algorithm was used to select features useful for classifying glioma grades in the training cohort. The selected features were used to build three classifier models of logistics, support vector machines, and random forest classifiers. The classification performance of the models was measured in the training cohort using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve. The trained classifier models were applied to the test cohort.

Results: Five significant features were selected for the machine learning classifiers and the three classifiers showed an average AUC of 0.9400 for training cohorts and 0.9030 (logistic regression 0.9010, support vector machine 0.8866, and random forest 0.9213) for test cohorts.

Discussion: Glioma grading could be accurately determined using machine learning and feature selection techniques in conjunction with a radiomics approach. The results of our study might contribute to high-throughput computer aided diagnosis system for gliomas.

Keywords: Glioma grading; Machine learning; Multi-modal imaging; Radiomics.

Grants and funding

This study was funded by the Institute for Basic Science (Grant no. IBS-R015-D1), the National Research Foundation of Korea (Grant no. NRF-2016R1A2B4008545) and the Ministry of Science and ICT of Korea under the ITRC Program (Grant no. IITP-2018-0-01798). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.