Preservation potential of keratin in deep time

PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0206569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206569. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Multiple fossil discoveries and taphonomic experiments have established the durability of keratin. The utility and specificity of antibodies to identify keratin peptides has also been established, both in extant feathers under varying treatment conditions, and in feathers from extinct organisms. Here, we show localization of feather-keratin antibodies to control and heat-treated feathers, testifying to the repeatability of initial data supporting the preservation potential of keratin. We then show new data at higher resolution that demonstrates the specific response of these antibodies to the feather matrix, we support the presence of protein in heat-treated feathers using ToF-SIMS, and we apply these methods to a fossil feather preserved in the unusual environment of sinter hot springs. We stress the importance of employing realistic conditions such as sediment burial when designing experiments intended as proxies for taphonomic processes occurring in the fossil record. Our data support the hypothesis that keratin, particularly the β-keratin that comprises feathers, has potential to preserve in fossil remains.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Antibodies
  • Feathers* / chemistry
  • Feathers* / immunology
  • Feathers* / ultrastructure
  • Fossils* / ultrastructure
  • Hot Springs
  • Hot Temperature
  • Keratins* / chemistry
  • Keratins* / immunology
  • Tetrahydroisoquinolines
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Antibodies
  • Tetrahydroisoquinolines
  • Keratins
  • moexipril

Grants and funding

This study was supported by: National Science Foundation, INSPIRE, EAR- 1344198 and The David and Lucile Packard Foundation (MHS); Swedish Research Council, Grant for Distinguished Young Researchers, 642-2014-3773 (JL); Lynn and Susan Orr, Vance and Gayle Mullis (MHS). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.