Pharmacist documentation of gaps in care identified during diabetes coaching

J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019 Jan-Feb;59(1):57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Nov 13.

Abstract

Objectives: 1) To identify the number of gaps, type of gaps, and contributing factors to gaps in diabetes care reported by pharmacists in the Diabetes Gaps in Care Portal (Gaps Portal). 2) To understand how pharmacists used the Gaps Portal and the implications for quality diabetes care.

Design: The Alliance for Patient Medication Safety developed an online Gaps Portal as a tool for pharmacists to identify and document gaps in care when managing patients with diabetes.

Setting: Pharmacists from across the United States in community pharmacy and ambulatory care settings who were engaged in diabetes coaching activities participated.

Main outcome measures: Pharmacists entered gaps in diabetes care into the Gaps Portal from April 2016 to June 2017. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the type and number of gaps and contributing factors. A qualitative analysis of pharmacist interviews was conducted to identify themes related to pharmacist perceptions of the portal.

Results: Ten pharmacists entered 528 gaps in diabetes care (n = 469; 565 encounters). The most common category of gaps in diabetes care was drug therapy (n = 420/528; 79.6%). Of the drug therapy gaps reported, the most common gap occurred in patients with or at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and not on a high-intensity statin (122/420), followed by those not on a moderate statin (106/420). Themes focused on during interviews included integration of diabetes coaching and documentation, impact of Gaps Portal on workflow, and prioritization of gaps.

Conclusion: Pharmacists most commonly identified drug therapy gaps, predominantly pertaining to statin use, which coincides with a change in the guidelines for statin use in diabetics. Telephone interviews indicated that the Gaps Portal template served as a useful checklist to identify gaps in care during diabetes coaching activities and that the Gaps Portal was useful for reporting and monitoring purposes.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Ambulatory Care / statistics & numerical data*
  • Community Pharmacy Services
  • Diabetes Mellitus*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pharmacists*
  • Professional Practice Gaps / statistics & numerical data*
  • Professional Role
  • Qualitative Research