Efficacy and safety of 3D print-assisted surgery for the treatment of pilon fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Nov 12;13(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0976-x.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of 3D print-assisted surgery and conventional surgery in the treatment of pilon fractures.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, CBM, and WanFang data were searched until July 2018. Two reviewers selected relevant studies, assessed the quality of studies, and extracted data. For continuous data, a weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used. For dichotomous data, a relative risk (RR) and 95% CI were calculated as the summary statistics.

Results: There were seven randomized controlled trials (RCT) enrolling a total of 486 patients, 242 patients underwent 3D print-assisted surgery and 244 patients underwent conventional surgery. The pooled outcomes demonstrate 3D print-assisted surgery was superior to conventional surgery in terms of operation time [WMD = - 26.16, 95% CI (- 33.19, - 19.14), P < 0.001], blood loss [WMD = - 63.91, 95% CI (- 79.55, - 48.27), P < 0.001], postoperative functional scores [WMD = 8.16, 95% CI (5.04, 11.29), P < 0.001], postoperative visual analogue score (VAS) [WMD = - 0.59, 95% CI (- 1.18, - 0.01), P = 0.05], rate of excellent and good outcome [RR = 1.20, 95% CI (1.07, 1.34), P = 0.002], and rate of anatomic reduction [RR = 1.35, 95% CI (1.19, 1.53), P < 0.001]. However, there was no significant difference between the groups regarding the rate of infection [RR = 0.51, 95% CI (0.20, 1.31), P = 0.16], fracture union time [WMD = - 0.85, 95% CI (- 1.79, 0.08), P = 0.07], traumatic arthritis [RR = 0.34, 95% CI (0.06, 2.09), P = 0.24], and malunion [RR = 0.34, 95% CI (0.06, 2.05), P = 0.24].

Conclusions: Our meta-analysis demonstrates 3D print-assisted surgery was significantly better than conventional surgery in terms of operation time, blood loss, postoperative functional score, postoperative VAS, rate of excellent and good outcome, and rate of anatomic reduction. Concerning postoperative complications, there were no significant differences between the groups.

Keywords: 3D printing; Computer-assisted; Pilon fractures; Surgery; Three-dimensional.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Ankle Fractures / diagnostic imaging
  • Ankle Fractures / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Operative Time
  • Postoperative Complications / diagnostic imaging
  • Postoperative Complications / prevention & control
  • Preoperative Care / methods
  • Preoperative Care / standards
  • Printing, Three-Dimensional / standards*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / methods*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / standards
  • Tibial Fractures / diagnostic imaging
  • Tibial Fractures / surgery*
  • Treatment Outcome