Cefoperazone versus ceftazidime monotherapy of nosocomial pneumonia

Am J Med. 1988 Jul 25;85(1A):44-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90174-x.

Abstract

Cefoperazone and ceftazidime monotherapy were compared in a randomized, prospective evaluation of patients with nosocomial pneumonia. These antibiotics were equally effective, with an overall successful treatment rate of 45 of 62 (73 percent) for cefoperazone-treated patients and 50 of 63 (79 percent) for ceftazidime-treated patients (p = 0.41). There was no difference in the incidence of side effects (including hypoprothrombinemia), superinfections, or colonization of the oropharynx with yeast, enterococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, or resistant gram-negative bacilli. When antibiotic administration, and laboratory costs are considered, cefoperazone is less expensive than ceftazidime. Both cefoperazone and ceftazidime are effective therapy for nosocomial pneumonia.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Bacteria / isolation & purification
  • Bacterial Infections / drug therapy*
  • Bacterial Infections / economics
  • Bacterial Infections / microbiology
  • Cefoperazone / adverse effects
  • Cefoperazone / therapeutic use*
  • Ceftazidime / adverse effects
  • Ceftazidime / therapeutic use*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Cross Infection / drug therapy*
  • Cross Infection / economics
  • Humans
  • Pneumonia / drug therapy*
  • Pneumonia / economics
  • Prospective Studies
  • Random Allocation
  • Sputum / microbiology

Substances

  • Cefoperazone
  • Ceftazidime