Follow-up ecological studies for cryptic species discoveries: Decrypting the leopard frogs of the eastern U.S

PLoS One. 2018 Nov 9;13(11):e0205805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205805. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Cryptic species are a challenge for systematics, but their elucidation also may leave critical information gaps about the distribution, conservation status, and behavior of affected species. We use the leopard frogs of the eastern U.S. as a case study of this issue. We refined the known range of the recently described Rana kauffeldi, the Atlantic Coast Leopard Frog, relative to the region's two other leopard frog species, conducted assessments of conservation status, and improved methods for separating the three species using morphological field characters. We conducted over 2,000 call and visual surveys and took photographs of and tissue samples from hundreds of frogs. Genetic analysis supported a three-species taxonomy and provided determinations for 220 individual photographed frogs. Rana kauffeldi was confirmed in eight U.S. states, from North Carolina to southern Connecticut, hewing closely to the Atlantic Coastal Plain. It can be reliably differentiated in life from R. pipiens, and from R. sphenocephala 90% of the time, based on such characters as the femoral reticulum patterning, dorsal spot size and number, and presence of a snout spot. However, the only diagnostic character separating R. kauffeldi from R. sphenocephala remains the breeding call described in 2014. Based on our field study, museum specimens, and prior survey data, we suggest that R. kauffeldi has declined substantially in the northern part of its range, but is more secure in the core of its range. We also report, for the first time, apparent extirpations of R. pipiens from the southeastern portion of its range, previously overlooked because of confusion with R. kauffeldi. We conclude with a generalized ecological research agenda for cryptic species. For R. kauffeldi, needs include descriptions of earlier life stages, studies of niche partitioning with sympatric congeners and the potential for hybridization, and identification of conservation actions to prevent further declines.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Connecticut
  • Conservation of Natural Resources*
  • Ecology*
  • North Carolina
  • Rana pipiens / classification
  • Rana pipiens / physiology*

Grants and funding

This study was funded by the Northeast Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies as Regional Conservation Needs grant 2013-03, administered by the Wildlife Management Institute, with matching funds and in-kind from the authors' institutions. J. Feinberg, J. Burger, and E. Kiviat were also supported by grants from the Hudson River Foundation, and B. Shaffer and S. Wenner by the NSF (DEB 1239961). The funders provided support in the form of salaries for authors [MDS, JAF, NHN, JB, EK, SMW, HBS], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section. EK and DPQ are affiliated with Hudsonia, Ltd. and CTHerpConsultant, LLC, respectively. The commercial affiliations of these two authors did not play any role in the study.