Background: Forearm cutaneous blood flux (CBF) measurement with post-occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) is uncomfortable and may not be devoid of risks. We aimed to investigate post-compression reactive hyperemia (PCRH) with a custom-made indenter that was designed to be easily used routinely by inexperienced observers.
Methods: Medical students evaluated PCRH with 1- to 4-min pressure applications of 16 to 34 kPa and PORH with 3-min forearm cuff occlusion using laser speckle contrast imaging in 15 healthy volunteers. Participants were asked to quantify their discomfort with a visual analogue scale (VAS) of 10 cm. Total ischemia (ISCH) was quantified by the product of CBF during ischemia and ischemia duration (min). We subtracted the CBF changes in the skin from a reference ipsilateral (PCRH) or contralateral (PORH) non-stimulated area.
Results: The average VAS was 1.0 for PCRH vs. 6.0 for PORH (p < 0.001). A strong linear relationship between ISCH and peak PCRH (r2 = 0.915, p < 0.001) was noted. Peak PORH values (63.9 laser perfusion units (LPU)) were significantly lower than all values of the 3-min PCRH (72.6 LPU), including the one obtained with 16 kPa.
Conclusion: Inexperienced observers could test microvascular reactivity with PCRH without inducing the discomfort that is typically experienced with PORH. Further, PCRH elicits a higher peak response to ischemia compared with PORH. This extremely simple method could influence a broad spectrum of routine cutaneous microcirculation investigations, especially when a painful approach is particularly inadequate or if the patient is fragile.
Clinical trial registration: NCT02861924.
Keywords: Cutaneous blood flow; Diagnosis; Hyperemia; Ischemia; Method; Microcirculation; Pain; Skin perfusion.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.