Background: Ventricular tachycardia clustering (VTc) is associated with a worse clinical outcome in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NI-DCM) and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD); however, its role after catheter ablation (CA) has still not been investigated. Aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of VTc after CA.
Methods: 96 consecutive patients (59 ± 13 years, 82% males) with NI-DCM underwent CA for drug-refractory VT. After CA, patients with VT recurrence were divided into two groups: (1) patients that presented with VTc defined as the occurrence of three or more appropriate ICD interventions within 2 weeks, and (2) patients without VTc.
Results: At 56-months follow-up after ablation 52/96 (54%) patients had recurrent VT, 28/52 (54%) patients experienced VTc and 24/52 (46%) no VTc. When comparing patients with VTc after CA with those without, no differences in terms of age, sex, ejection fraction and cardiovascular risk factors were found. However, patients with VTc showed higher mortality rates at follow-up (54% vs 21% p = 0.04; log-rank p ≤ 0.01). No survival differences were found between patients without VT recurrence and those with VT recurrence but without VTc (29% vs 21% p = 0.77). Predictors of VTc were LVEF < 30% at follow-up and endo-epicardial scar at 3D voltage mapping. At stepwise multivariate analysis VTc and NHYA class were the only independent predictors of death (respectively, RR 3.4, CI 95% 1.16-10.3, p = 0.02; RR 4.18, CI 95% 1.3-12.6, p = 0.01).
Conclusions: VTc after CA is an independent predictor of survival and is associated with reduced LVEF at follow-up and endo-epicardial scar at 3D voltage mapping.
Keywords: Clustering; DCM; Follow-up; Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy; Survival; Ventricular tachycardia.