Validity of the "Samsung Health" application to measure steps: A study with two different samsung smartphones

J Sports Sci. 2019 Apr;37(7):788-794. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1527199. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of a highly popular pedometer application (Samsung Health). Sixteen adults (28.8 ± 8.9 years of age) wore two Samsung smartphone models, Samsung Galaxy Core Prime (SGCP) and Samsung Galaxy S4 (SGS4), at three body locations (waist, arm, and hand) while walking and running over a 50-m test. All trials were recorded using a video as a gold standard measure of step counts. Results indicated that the validity of Samsung Health varied depending on the smartphone model, its body location, and the type of gait (walking and running). Samsung Health showed acceptable validity when the SGCP was located on the hand (Bias = -8.3%; RMSE = 5.6), and especially on the arm (Bias = -7.2%; RMSE = 4.9) while running, and when the SGS4 was located on the arm (Bias = -7.5%; RMSE = 5.4), and especially on the waist (Bias = 5.4%; RMSE = 3.7) while walking. Samsung Health only showed good validity when the SGS4 was located on the arm (Bias = 2.9%; RMSE = 3.6), and especially on the hand (Bias = 0.5%; RMSE = 2.5) while running. This application showed unacceptable validity in the remaining options.

Keywords: Pedometer; health; physical activity; running; walking.

Publication types

  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Abdomen
  • Actigraphy / methods*
  • Adult
  • Arm
  • Data Accuracy
  • Female
  • Fitness Trackers*
  • Hip
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mobile Applications*
  • Running / physiology
  • Smartphone / instrumentation*
  • Software Validation
  • Time and Motion Studies
  • Walking / physiology