[Evaluation of the management of low-risk pulmonary embolism diagnosed in an emergency department. HoPE study (Home treatment of Pulmonary Embolism)]

Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2019 Feb;68(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Introduction: Risk stratification allows outpatient management of low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE). Here, we carry out an evaluation of the professional practices on the emergency management of low-risk PE, after selection with the sPESI score.

Material and method: All patients admitted to the emergency department of Chambéry hospital, with a final diagnosis of PE are analyzed. The PE of score sPESI at 0 are included, in the absence of contraindications. Ninety-day follow-up is done. The objective is to evaluate the proportion of ambulatory care for low-risk patients.

Results: Eighty PE were diagnosed in 2016, 28 with sPESI score at 0 and 3 patients excluded. Of the 25 inclusions, 6 patients had signs of right ventricular dysfunction and were therefore hospitalized. The remaining 19 were eligible for outpatient care but only 8 of them stayed less than 24hours in the hospital.

Discussion: The sPESI score is a decision support tool for outpatient management but should not be used alone. The search for right ventricular dysfunction seems important here.

Keywords: Ambulatoire; Bas risque; Dysfonction ventriculaire droite; Embolie pulmonaire; Low risk; Outpatient; Pulmonary embolism; Right ventricular dysfunction; SPESI score; Score sPESI.

Publication types

  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Ambulatory Care / statistics & numerical data*
  • Decision Support Techniques*
  • Emergency Service, Hospital
  • Female
  • France
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Admission / statistics & numerical data*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Pulmonary Embolism / diagnosis*
  • Pulmonary Embolism / therapy*
  • Risk Assessment*
  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Right / diagnosis