Simultaneous application of predictive model and least cost formulation can substantially benefit biorefineries outside Corn Belt in United States: A case study in Florida

Bioresour Technol. 2019 Jan:271:218-227. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.103. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

Abstract

Previously, a predictive model was developed to identify optimal blends of expensive high-quality and cheaper low-quality feedstocks for a given geographical location that can deliver high sugar yields. In this study, the optimal process conditions were tested for application at commercially-relevant higher biomass loadings. We observed lower sugar yields but 100% conversion to ethanol from a blend that contained only 20% high-quality feedstock. The impact of applying this predictive model simultaneously with least cost formulation model for a biorefinery location outside of the US Corn Belt in Lee County, Florida was investigated. A blend ratio of 0.30 EC, 0.45 SG, and 0.25 CS in Lee County was necessary to produce sugars at high yields and ethanol at a capacity of 50 MMGY. This work demonstrates utility in applying predictive model and LCF to reduce feedstock costs and supply chain risks while optimizing for product yields.

Keywords: Biomass blends; Fermentation; Impact analysis; Least Cost Formulation (LCF); Predictive model.

MeSH terms

  • Biomass
  • Carbohydrate Metabolism
  • Carbohydrates
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Ethanol / economics
  • Ethanol / metabolism
  • Fermentation
  • Florida
  • Zea mays*

Substances

  • Carbohydrates
  • Ethanol