Wild great and blue tits do not avoid chemical cues of predators when selecting cavities for roosting

PLoS One. 2018 Sep 19;13(9):e0203269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203269. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Small birds use cavities for roosting to decrease the thermoregulatory costs during the winter nights. The ability of birds to detect and escape from an approaching predator is impaired during roosting and thus the selection of such cavities should take into account the risk that a predator will find the cavity. Previous evidence suggested that birds in captivity are able to detect predator scent and avoid roosting in nest-boxes containing such predator chemical cues. Here, we tested whether birds also show this avoidance response under natural conditions. We performed three studies in three populations of blue and great tits. We added predator scent, a pungency scent or an odourless control to nest-boxes and compared the use of these nest-boxes for roosting. We found no differences between the scent treatments in the use of nest-boxes. Therefore, chemical cues indicating the potential presence of a predator are not enough for birds to avoid roosting in nest-boxes under natural conditions.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adaptation, Physiological
  • Animals
  • Body Temperature Regulation
  • Cues
  • Female
  • Male
  • Nesting Behavior / physiology*
  • Odorants
  • Passeriformes / physiology*
  • Predatory Behavior
  • Seasons

Grants and funding

L.A. and G.T. were supported by the postdoctoral JAE-CSIC, the postdoctoral MEC and by the Ramon y Cajal program. IRG was supported by the predoctoral FPI program. The study was funded by the MINECO project CGL2014-58890-P to L.A. and G.T. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.