Using geographically weighted regression for social inequality analysis: association between mentally unhealthy days (MUDs) and socioeconomic status (SES) in U.S. counties

Int J Environ Health Res. 2019 Apr;29(2):140-153. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2018.1521915. Epub 2018 Sep 19.

Abstract

This research explores geographic variability of factors on social inequality related to mental health in the United States using county-level data in 2014. First, we account for complex design factors in Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data such as clustering, stratification, and sample weight using Complex Samples General Linear Model (CSGLM). Then, three variables are used in the model as indicators of social inequality, low socioeconomic status (SES): unemployment, education status, and social association status. A geographically weighted regression analysis is applied to examine the spatial variations in the associations of mentally unhealthy days (MUDs) with the indicators of SES in the United States. The results demonstrate that unemployment and education level show global positive and negative influences respectively on MUDs. Social association status ranged from positive to negative across the United States, implying some geographic clustering. These findings suggest that social and health policies should be adjusted to address the different effects of indicators of social inequality on mental health across different social characteristics of communities to more effectively manage mental health problems.

Keywords: Complex Samples General Linear Model (CSGLM); Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR); Social inequality; U.S counties; mental health.

MeSH terms

  • Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System*
  • Geography
  • Humans
  • Mental Health / statistics & numerical data*
  • Social Class*
  • Spatial Regression
  • United States