The current study examines in silico characterization of the structure-inhibitory potency for a set of phenylcarbamic acid derivatives containing an N-arylpiperazine scaffold, considering the electronic, steric and lipophilic properties. The main objective of the ligand-based modelling was the systematic study of classical comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA)/comparative molecular surface analysis (CoMSA) performance for the modelling of in vitro efficiency observed for these phenylcarbamates, revealing their inhibitory activities against a virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv strain. We compared the findings of efficiency modelling produced by a standard 3D methodology (CoMFA) and its neural counterparts (CoMSA) regarding multiple training/test subsets and variables used. Moreover, systematic space inspection, splitting values into the analysed training/test subsets, was performed to monitor statistical estimator performance while mapping the probability-driven pharmacophore pattern. Consequently, a 'pseudo-consensus' 3D-quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) approach was applied to retrieve an 'average' pharmacophore hypothesis by the investigation of the most densely populated training/test subpopulations to specify the potentially important factors contributing to the inhibitory activity of phenylcarbamic acid analogues. In addition, examination of descriptor-based similarity with a principal component analysis (PCA) procedure was employed to visualize noticeable variations in the performance of these molecules with respect to their structure and activity profiles.
Keywords: CoMFA; CoMSA; pharmacophore mapping; phenylcarbamic acids; variable elimination.