Outcomes in Bilateral Vocal Fold Immobility: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Dec;159(6):1020-1027. doi: 10.1177/0194599818800462. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

Abstract

Objective: To test the hypothesis that the etiologies of bilateral vocal fold mobility impairment (BLVFI), bilateral vocal fold paralysis (BVFP), and posterior glottis stenosis (PGS) have distinct clinical outcomes. To identify patient-specific and procedural factors that influence tracheostomy-free survival.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Johns Hopkins Medical Center from 2004 to 2015.

Subjects and methods: Case series with chart review of 68 patients with PGS and 17 patients with BVFP. Multiple logistic regression analysis determined factors associated with airway prosthesis dependence at last follow-up and the procedural burden (defined as number of operative procedures per year).

Results: PGS comprised the majority of BLVFI (76%). PGS injury arose primarily after endotracheal intubation (91%), while BVFP most commonly was due to iatrogenic surgical injury to bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerves (88%, P < .001). Overall in BLVFI, 66% were tracheostomy free at last follow-up (62% in PGS, 82% in BVFP). Of those who underwent an operative intervention to be decannulated, 88% were decannulated (90% PGS, 80% BVFP). Patients with PGS required higher procedural burden to achieve decannulation compared with the BVFP cohort (3.1 ± 5.2 vs 0.71 ± 1.4, P = .002). In multivariate analysis of PGS, smoking was a risk factor for tracheostomy dependence (P = .026).

Conclusions: BLVFI is primarily an iatrogenic complication. There are high rates of tracheostomy dependence in BLVFI, with procedural intervention needed for decannulation. Compared with BVFP, patients with PGS had a higher procedural burden overall and to achieve decannulation. Patients with PGS should be counseled that smoking, a modifiable risk factor, may increase the risk of tracheostomy dependence.

Keywords: bilateral vocal fold immobility; bilateral vocal fold paralysis; glottic stenosis; outcomes in bilateral vocal fold immobility; posterior glottic stenosis; vocal fold immobility.