A self-adjuvanted nanoparticle based vaccine against infectious bronchitis virus

PLoS One. 2018 Sep 14;13(9):e0203771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203771. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) affects poultry respiratory, renal and reproductive systems. Currently the efficacy of available live attenuated or killed vaccines against IBV has been challenged. We designed a novel IBV vaccine alternative using a highly innovative platform called Self-Assembling Protein Nanoparticle (SAPN). In this vaccine, B cell epitopes derived from the second heptad repeat (HR2) region of IBV spike proteins were repetitively presented in its native trimeric conformation. In addition, flagellin was co-displayed in the SAPN to achieve a self-adjuvanted effect. Three groups of chickens were immunized at four weeks of age with the vaccine prototype, IBV-Flagellin-SAPN, a negative-control construct Flagellin-SAPN or a buffer control. The immunized chickens were challenged with 5x10(4.7) EID50 IBV M41 strain. High antibody responses were detected in chickens immunized with IBV-Flagellin-SAPN. In ex vivo proliferation tests, peripheral mononuclear cells (PBMCs) derived from IBV-Flagellin-SAPN immunized chickens had a significantly higher stimulation index than that of PBMCs from chickens receiving Flagellin-SAPN. Chickens immunized with IBV-Flagellin-SAPN had a significant reduction of tracheal virus shedding and lesser tracheal lesion scores than did negative control chickens. The data demonstrated that the IBV-Flagellin-SAPN holds promise as a vaccine for IBV.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Chickens
  • Coronavirus Infections / immunology
  • Coronavirus Infections / veterinary*
  • Infectious bronchitis virus / immunology*
  • Nanoparticles*
  • Poultry Diseases / immunology
  • Poultry Diseases / prevention & control*
  • Viral Vaccines / chemistry
  • Viral Vaccines / therapeutic use*

Substances

  • Viral Vaccines

Grants and funding

NIFA-USDA provided support for authors PB and MK and The Charles River Laboratories, Avian vaccine services, provided support in the form of salaries for authors (T.G), but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these author are articulated in the „author contributions‟ section.