Objective: Our group has developed a method for 3D printing mechanically-realistic soft tissue, as a building block towards developing anatomically realistic 3D-printed biomechanical testbed models.
Methods: A Polyjet 3D printer was used to print lattice microstructures, which were tested in compression to evaluate the elastic profile. Lattice properties including element diameter, element spacing (ES), element cross-sectional geometry, element arrangement, and lattice rotation were varied to determine their effect on the stress-strain curve. As a case study, a single 3D printed sample was tuned such that its elastic profile matched plantar fat.
Results: Element diameter and ES had the largest effect on the stress-strain profile, and rotating the lattice microstructure tends to linearize the curves. A simple cubic lattice microstructure of cylindrical elements, with 0.5 mm diameter columns and 1.2 mm spacing had a stress-strain curve the was closest to plantar fat. The elastic modulus at 10, 30, and 50% strain was 7.55, 9.50, and 252 kPa respectively. Physiologic plantar fat at the same strain values has moduli values of 1.08, 7.13, and 188 kPa.
Significance: We demonstrated that lattice microstructures can decrease the young's modulus of soft 3D printed materials by three orders of magnitude. By creating a method for fine-tuning the elastic profile of 3D-printed materials to behave like human soft tissue, we provide an attractive alternative to more exotic and time-consuming techniques such as molding and casting.