Validity and reliability of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T), Turkish version1

Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018 Sep 6:26:e3037. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2413.3037.
[Article in English, Portuguese, Spanish]

Abstract

Objective: A methodological type of study was conducted for the purpose of investigating the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T) evaluation scale of the clinical learning environment of students, clinical nurses, and educators.

Methods: Sample was comprised of 602 Turkish nursing students with clinical practice experience at the hospital. The CLES+T, developed by Saarikoski, was used for data collection. Language equivalency, internal consistency, item-total correlation, and structure validity were conducted within the scope of the validity and reliability study on the CLES +T scale.

Results: It was determined that item-total correlations of four items were lower than 0.30, and those items were removed from the scale as a result of item analysis. The Cronbach's alpha value of the scale was 0.93-0.99; item total point correlations of the scale varied between 0.45 and 0.66; six factors were identified in the CLES+T factor analysis study, with a total variance explained by these six factors of 64%.

Conclusion: According to the findings of the research, the CLES+T Turkish version was found to be a valid and reliable scale, which can be used to evaluate satisfaction of nursing students with their clinical education in Turkey.

Publication types

  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cross-Cultural Comparison
  • Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate / standards*
  • Factor Analysis, Statistical
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Interpersonal Relations
  • Language
  • Learning*
  • Male
  • Nursing, Supervisory / standards*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Students, Nursing / psychology*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires / standards*
  • Translations
  • Turkey
  • Young Adult