Comparing Retention and Internal Adaptation of Different Implant-Supported, Metal-Free Frameworks

Int J Prosthodont. 2018 Sep/Oct;31(5):475-477. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5800.

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to compare the fit and retention of implant-supported, metal-free copings fabricated from zirconia, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), or composite, as well as to evaluate the possible correlation between internal adaptation and retention.

Materials and methods: A total of 36 copings were milled from zirconia, PEEK, or composite blanks (n = 12 in each group). Marginal and internal gap were evaluated by replica technique, and the pull-out test was used to evaluate retention. One-way analysis of variance, post hoc Tukey tests, and Pearson correlation coefficient test were used to analyze the data.

Results: Zirconia had significantly better marginal/internal adaptation (P < .05) than the other materials. There was no statistically significant difference in mean retention force between the different groups (P > .05). No correlation was found between internal adaptation and retention.

Conclusion: In the metal-free copings tested, zirconia showed the best adaptation. The retention of copings was not influenced by internal fit or material type.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Benzophenones
  • Composite Resins
  • Computer-Aided Design
  • Correlation of Data
  • Crowns*
  • Dental Abutments
  • Dental Marginal Adaptation*
  • Dental Prosthesis Design*
  • Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported / standards*
  • Dental Restoration Failure*
  • Denture Retention
  • Humans
  • Ketones
  • Metals
  • Polyethylene Glycols
  • Polymers
  • Zirconium

Substances

  • Benzophenones
  • Composite Resins
  • Ketones
  • Metals
  • Polymers
  • polyetheretherketone
  • Polyethylene Glycols
  • Zirconium
  • zirconium oxide