Objective: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) lowers intracranial pressure and improves outcomes in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery stroke; yet, its usefulness in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is unclear. The authors sought to assess the preliminary utility of decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) without clot evacuation in patients with deep-seated supratentorial ICH.
Patients and methods: Patients with deep seated spontaneous ICH who were admitted to the Golestan Hospital, of Ahvaz, from November 2014 to February 2016, were prospectively enrolled in this study. A prospective clinical trial where 30 patients diagnosed having large hypertensive ICH was randomly allocated to either group A or B using permuted-block randomization. These patients (n = 30), who all had large deep seated supratentorial ICH with surgery indications, were randomly divided to two groups. ultimately, in one group (n = 13), large DHC was performed without clot evacuation, while in the other (n = 17), craniotomy with clot evacuation was done. Data pertaining to the patients' characteristics and treatment outcomes were prospectively collected.
Results: There was no statistically significant difference between two treatment groups (P > 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of mortality and GOS at 6 months (P > 0.05); nevertheless, the good outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale = 4-5) for patients with hematoma evacuation was slightly higher (35.3%) as compared to the DHC patients without clot evacuation (30.7%).
Conclusion: Decompresive craniectomy without clot evacuation in deep seated ICH can be accomplished with identical mortality and outcome in comparison to patient that undergone clot evacuation.
Keywords: Decompresive craniectomy; Glasgow Outcome Scale; Hematoma evacuation; Intracerebral Hemorrhage.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.