Background: Cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is the standard treatment for patients suffering from CTI-dependent atrial flutter (AFL). The aim of this study was to compare the use in clinical practice of 8-mm gold-tip catheter (8mmRFC) and open-irrigated gold-tip catheter (irrRFC) for RF typical AFL ablation.
Methods: Patients with typical AFL were treated with 8mmRFC or irrRFC catheters according to investigator preferences. The primary endpoint was the cumulative radiofrequency time (CRFT). Fluoroscopy time, acute and 6-month success rates were secondary endpoints.
Results: After excluding 3 patients with left AFL, 157 of the enrolled patients (median age 71.8 [interquartile range, 64.1-76.2], 76% men, 91% in NYHA class ≤II, 65% with no structural heart disease) were analyzed: 74 (47%) subjects were treated with the 8mmRFC and 83 (53%) with the irrRFC. The median CRFT was 3 [2-6] minutes in the 8mmRFC group and 5 [3-7] minutes in the irrRFC group (P = .183). There were no significant differences in ablation success rates, intraprocedural CTI reconnections, audible steam pops, and procedural times. In the 8mmRFC group, a significantly lower fluoroscopy time was observed as compared to the irrRFC group (8 [5-12] vs 15 [10-20] minutes, P < .001). During the follow-up period, AFL recurrences were documented in 3 patients in the 8mmRFC group and 2 in the irrRFC group (P = .655).
Conclusions: The 8mmRFC and the irrRFC performed similarly in routine practice for CTI ablation in terms of cumulative RF time, acute and 6-month success rates. Fluoroscopy time was significantly lower in the 8mmRFC group.
Keywords: catheter ablation; cavotricuspid isthmus; gold‐tip catheter; radiofrequency; typical atrial flutter.