Non-coding transcript variants of protein-coding genes - what are they good for?

RNA Biol. 2018;15(8):1025-1031. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2018.1511675. Epub 2018 Sep 10.

Abstract

The total number of protein-coding genes in the human genome is not significantly higher than those in much simpler eukaryotes, despite a general increase in genome size proportionate to the organismal complexity. The large non-coding transcriptome and extensive differential splicing, are increasingly being accepted as the factors contributing to the complex mammalian physiology and architecture. Recent studies reveal additional layers of functional complexity: some long non-coding RNAs have been re-defined as micropeptide or microprotein encoding transcripts, and in turn some protein-coding RNAs are bifunctional and display also non-coding functions. Moreover, several protein-coding genes express long non-coding RNA splice-forms and generate circular RNAs in addition to their canonical mRNA transcripts, revoking the strict definition of a gene as coding or non-coding. In this mini review, we discuss the current understanding of these hybrid genes and their possible roles and relevance.

Keywords: ceRNA; circRNA; cncRNAs; lncRNAs; non-coding RNA; smORF; splicing; translation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Gene Expression Regulation*
  • Humans
  • Open Reading Frames / genetics*
  • RNA, Long Noncoding / genetics*

Substances

  • RNA, Long Noncoding