The sudden prevalence increase of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) related to the use of cross-sectional imaging has raised several concerns. Even if there is a tangible risk of progression towards pancreatic cancer (PC), surgical resection cannot be offered to all patients due to the high risk of morbidity and mortality. Available guidelines are useful tools to identify patients at higher risk for harboring cancer thanks to their sensitivity. Because of their low specificity, however, such a risk is often overestimated. Recent evidence deriving from large observational series of surveilled patients suggests that the overall risk of PC is low. A large proportion of patients affected by PCN can be safely observed over time. Several follow-up schedules have been proposed in guidelines but none of them proved to be the most cost-effective. Moreover, it must still be demonstrated that any surveillance protocol can be associated with a reduction in PC-related mortality. By now, with most studies reporting a lifelong risk of malignancy, the only evidence-based recommendation regarding surveillance is that follow-up should never be discontinued as repeated observations are crucial for PC risk stratification.
Keywords: Guidelines; Pancreatic cancer; Pancreatic cystic neoplasms; Surveillance.