Naloxone distribution and possession following a large-scale naloxone programme

Addiction. 2019 Jan;114(1):92-100. doi: 10.1111/add.14425. Epub 2018 Sep 14.

Abstract

Aims: To examine uptake following a large-scale naloxone programme by estimating distribution rates since programme initiation and the proportion among a sample of high-risk individuals who had attended naloxone training, currently possessed or had used naloxone. We also estimated the likelihood of naloxone possession and use as a function of programme duration, individual descriptive and substance use indicators.

Design: (1) Distribution data (June 2014-August 2017) and date of implementation for each city and (2) a cross-sectional study among a sample of illicit substance users interviewed September 2017.

Setting: Seven Norwegian cities.

Participants: A total of 497 recruited users of illegal opioids and/or central stimulants.

Measurements: Primary outcomes: naloxone possession and use. Random-intercepts logistic regression models (covariates: male, age, homelessness/shelter use, overdose, incarceration, opioid maintenance treatment, income sources, substance use indicators, programme duration).

Findings: Overall, 4631 naloxone nasal sprays were distributed in the two pilot cities, with a cumulative rate of 495 per 100 000 population. In the same two cities, among high-risk individuals, 44% and 62% reported current naloxone possession. The possession rates of naloxone corresponded well to the duration of each participating city's distribution programme. Overall, in the six distributing cities, 58% reported naloxone training, 43% current possession and 15% naloxone use. The significant indicators for possession were programme duration [adjusted odds ratios (aOR) = 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI = 0.82-2.37], female gender (aOR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.20-3.24) and drug-dealing (aOR = 2.36, 95% CI = 1.42-3.93). The significant indicators for naloxone use were programme duration (aOR = 1.49 95%, CI = 1.15-1.92), homelessness/shelter use (aOR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.02-4.17), opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) (aOR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.13-3.78), drug-dealing (aOR = 2.40, 95% CI = 1.27-4.54) and heroin injecting (aOR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.04-4.38).

Conclusions: A large-scale naloxone programme in seven Norwegian cities with a cumulative distribution rate of 495 per 100 000 population indicated good saturation in a sample of high-risk individuals, with programme duration in each city as an important indicator for naloxone possession and use.

Keywords: Naloxone; naloxone distribution; naloxone possession; opioid overdose; overdose prevention; people who inject drugs.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Analgesics, Opioid / poisoning
  • Drug Overdose / drug therapy*
  • Drug Trafficking / statistics & numerical data*
  • Female
  • Heroin Dependence / drug therapy
  • Heroin Dependence / epidemiology*
  • Humans
  • Ill-Housed Persons / statistics & numerical data*
  • Likelihood Functions
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Naloxone / therapeutic use*
  • Narcotic Antagonists / therapeutic use*
  • Nasal Sprays
  • Norway / epidemiology
  • Opiate Substitution Treatment / statistics & numerical data*
  • Sex Factors
  • Substance Abuse, Intravenous / epidemiology*

Substances

  • Analgesics, Opioid
  • Narcotic Antagonists
  • Nasal Sprays
  • Naloxone