Overall survival and risk of second malignancies with cancer chemotherapy and G-CSF support

Ann Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;29(9):1903-1910. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy311.

Abstract

Background: The use of supportive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to reduce the risk of neutropenic complications in high-risk cancer patients is consistently recommended by several clinical practice guidelines. However, in a previous meta-analysis, G-CSF prophylaxis was associated with an increased risk of secondary malignancies while reducing long-term mortality. We present here an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was carried out to identify randomized controlled trials of cancer patients receiving conventional-dose chemotherapy, assigned to primary G-CSF support or a control group without initial G-CSF, with at least 2 years of follow-up. Studies were categorized into one of the four groups, based on the chemotherapy regimen and study design. An updated meta-analysis was carried out; relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause mortality and secondary malignancies were calculated.

Results: Of 2604 articles screened, 14 eligible studies were identified and combined with studies identified in the previous systematic literature searches. The updated meta-analysis included a total of 68 studies presenting 71 separate comparisons. Survival was significantly improved in patients receiving primary G-CSF support, compared with patients without primary G-CSF support (mortality RR=0.92; 95% CI 0.90-0.95; ARD=-3.3%; 95% CI -4.2--2.4; P < 0.0001). The largest improvement in survival was observed with dose-dense chemotherapy regimens with G-CSF support, compared with controls receiving no G-CSF support (mortality RR=0.86; 95% CI 0.80-0.92; P < 0.0001). Patients who received primary G-CSF support experienced a significantly higher risk of secondary malignancies, compared with controls (RR=1.85; 95% CI 1.19-2.88; ARD=0.47; 95% CI 0.21-0.73; P < 0.01).

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that overall survival is improved in patients receiving intensified chemotherapy with primary G-CSF support, compared with those receiving standard chemotherapy. Primary G-CSF support was also associated with a higher risk of developing secondary malignancies, including secondary acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Agents / adverse effects*
  • Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia / etiology
  • Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia / prevention & control*
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor / administration & dosage*
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Neoplasms / blood
  • Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Neoplasms / mortality
  • Neoplasms, Second Primary / chemically induced
  • Neoplasms, Second Primary / epidemiology*
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Risk Assessment

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor