Powder and Powder-Free Intra-Oral Scanners: Digital Impression Accuracy

Prim Dent J. 2018 Summer;7(2):40-3. doi: 10.1177/205016841800700207.

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of digital impressions taken with two different intra-oral scanners (with and without optical powder), by dentists with different level of experience.

Material and methods: Two intra-oral scanning devices (Apollo DI and Cerec Omnicam, Sirona Dental GmbH, Germany) were used to obtain a digital cast from scanning different preparations on a maxillary typodont. Three operator groups scanned five crown preparations using both powder and powder-free scanning systems. One group consisted of fourth year dental students, a second group consisted of prosthodontic residents, and third group consisted of prosthodontic specialists. The precision of spray application and impression expertise was compared between the three groups.

Results: The most frequently encountered errors were non-linear powder application, inappropriate intra-oral scanner manipulation, and insufficient digital data for crown fabrication.

Conclusion: Experience is needed in order to achieve high quality digital impressions. A prosthodontic specialist avoided incorrect manipulation of an intra-oral camera, uneven application of powder spray and achieved a better marginal fit.

MeSH terms

  • Crowns
  • Dental Impression Technique / instrumentation*
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted*
  • Powders

Substances

  • Powders