Background: The role of single-incision mini-slings (SIMS) in stress urinary incontinence (SUI) management is still not elucidated.
Objective: To compare efficacy and safety of SIMS and transobturator sling (TOT) for SUI after 36-month follow-up.
Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial involving 130 women with SUI that had either SIMS or TOT. Primary outcomes: objective cure defined as negative cough stress and pad tests, and subjective cure reported as satisfaction and no desire for additional treatment.
Secondary outcomes: quality-of-life by IQOL and UDI-6 questionnaires, complications and reoperation rates. Student's t, χ2 , Fisher's exact, and Mann-Whitney tests, ANOVA and P < 0.05 as cut-off point were used for statistics.
Results: A total of 82 patients (n:41 each arm) completed 36-month follow-up. Objective cure was lower in the SIMS compared to TOT groups by both per protocol (68.3% and 90.2%, respectively, P = 0.027) and intention-to-treat analysis considering missing data as failures (40.6% and 60.7%, respectively, P = 0.035), while similar in both groups (81.2% and 93.4%, respectively) considering missing data as successes. Subjective cure rates were similar for both groups. TOT group presented better outcome regarding the avoidance and limiting behavior domain of IQOL (P = 0.021), and UDI-6 scores (P = 0.026). Seven out of 69 (10.1%) women in the SIMS group compared with two out of 61 (3.3%) in the TOT group (P = 0.172) had repeat surgery due to recurrent SUI at year follow up.
Conclusion: TOT was associated to higher objective cure rate than SIMS for SUI treatment although satisfaction rate was similar for both groups 3 years postoperative.
Keywords: midurethral sling; mini-sling; single-incision mini-sling; stress urinary incontinence.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.