Assessing the impact of the diet on cardiometabolic outcomes: are multiple measurements post-intervention necessary?

Eur J Clin Nutr. 2019 Nov;73(11):1546-1550. doi: 10.1038/s41430-018-0257-0. Epub 2018 Jul 31.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine how using the mean of two consecutive measurements vs. one measurement post-treatment influences the sample size required to detect changes in cardiometabolic risk factors in dietary studies. For a given statistical power, using the mean of two measurements taken on consecutive days post-treatment instead of a single measurement significantly reduces the sample size required to observe changes in triglyceride, total apolipoprotein B100, and C-reactive protein concentrations in the context of a supplementation study. In the context of a controlled-feeding study, this gain is seen only in the case of change in triglyceride concentrations.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Diet / statistics & numerical data*
  • Docosahexaenoic Acids / administration & dosage
  • Humans
  • Lipids / blood*
  • Metabolic Diseases
  • Research Design / standards*
  • Risk Factors

Substances

  • Lipids
  • Docosahexaenoic Acids