States worse than death

Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018 Oct;24(5):415-420. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000529.

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review aims to discuss situations where patients would prefer to consider dying rather than survive, particularly in the context of choosing whether to be subjected to active medical management aimed at increasing their life span.

Recent findings: Obviously, there are no randomized trials on evaluating whether patients would choose death rather than life. Moreover, the topic of the review is rarely addressed in a conventional scientific way. Instead, we review the suffering that people may go through when receiving futile care in both the short and long-term in acute hospitals and how this may influence people's decisions about their own Goals of Care.

Summary: The review describes the failure of acute hospitals to recognize people at the end of life until very late and, when they are recognized, the failure to manage the dying process well. The inference is that if patients were genuinely aware of the potential short and long-term suffering involved in futile care, they would consider those states worse, may be worse than death, especially when death is almost certainly inevitable with or without conventional treatment.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Attitude to Death
  • Death
  • Decision Making / ethics*
  • Humans
  • Life Support Care / ethics
  • Life Support Care / psychology*
  • Patient Preference / psychology*
  • Patient Preference / statistics & numerical data
  • Personal Autonomy
  • Quality of Life / psychology*
  • Right to Die* / ethics
  • Terminally Ill / psychology*