Seasonal variation in preference dictates space use in an invasive generalist

PLoS One. 2018 Jul 20;13(7):e0199078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199078. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Background: The spatiotemporal distribution of resources is a critical component of realized animal distributions. In agricultural landscapes, space use by generalist consumers is influenced by ephemeral resource availability that may produce behavioral differences across agricultural seasons, resulting in economic and production consequences and increased human-wildlife conflict. Our objective was to assess changes in habitat selection across seasons in an invasive generalist omnivore (feral pigs, Sus scrofa). Hypothesizing that pig space use is primarily driven by forage availability, we predicted strong selection for the most nutritionally beneficial crops and resource types as agricultural seasons progressed. We deployed GPS collars on 13 adult feral pigs in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley to study resource selection in a fragmented agricultural landscape. We estimated resource selection using mixed-effect logistic regression to assess variation in selection across planting, growing, harvest, and fallow seasons.

Results: We found that feral pigs varied resource selection across seasons, particularly for corn (Zea mais). We also detected seasonal dependencies in proportional coverage on the net probability of selection of a land unit (e.g., selection was generally strongest for locations composed of both agricultural and natural habitat), resulting in marked variation in predicted space use among agricultural seasons.

Conclusions: These findings indicate behavioral changes in selection across agricultural seasons are driven by complex interactions between the availabilities of temporally dynamic resources and temporally static natural cover. Temporal variations in resource selection trends indicate seasonal responses to crop phenology which suggests a season-specific habitat functional response.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Animal Distribution / physiology*
  • Animals
  • Crops, Agricultural / growth & development
  • Crops, Agricultural / supply & distribution
  • Ecosystem
  • Feeding Behavior / physiology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mississippi
  • Models, Statistical*
  • Seasons
  • Spatio-Temporal Analysis
  • Sus scrofa / physiology*
  • Zea mays / growth & development

Grants and funding

This work was supported by Mississippi Agriculture and Forest Experiment Station, Mississippi State University Extension Services, and the National Feral Swine Damage Management Program of the United States Department of Agriculture Animal Plant Health Inspection Service National Wildlife Research Center 14-7428-1089CA. Funding was received by GMS, BKS, JLT, and KCV.