Background: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes are a means of providing an alternative enteric route of nutrition. This study sought to identify risk factors for the prolonged need of a percutaneous endoscopic gastronomy tube (≥90 days) in adult trauma patients.
Methods: The trauma database of a level 1 trauma center was queried retrospectively to identify patients who had percutaneous endoscopic gastronomy tubes placed.
Results: A total of 9,772 charts were reviewed with 282 patients (2.9%) undergoing successful percutaneous endoscopic gastronomy tube placement. On review of discharged living patients, 195 had adequate clinical documentation to allow for analysis. The mean age was 57.5 years, admission serum albumin was 3.7 g/dL, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 1.1. The first recorded mean Glasgow Coma Scale was 10.7, and their Injury Severity Score was 23.2. The mean duration of total hospital stay was 23.8 days, intensive care unit stay was 16.5 days, and in-hospital ventilator days was 11.5. Of the 272 patients, 77 (41.4%) required percutaneous endoscopic gastronomy tubes for >90 days. Statistically significant characteristics on univariate analysis included increasing age, a greater Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and a greater number of in-hospital ventilator days. On logistic regression, a Charlson Comorbidity Index score >1 (odds ratio 1.27, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.56, P = .02) and greater in-hospital ventilator days (odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.09, P < .01) were predictive of the need for prolonged percutaneous endoscopic gastronomy tube placement.
Conclusion: A Charlson Comorbidity Index score >1 and prolonged in-hospital ventilator days were risk factors for the necessity of a percutaneous endoscopic gastronomy tube for ≥90 days after placement. This observation may assist patients/surrogates in decision-making when needing alternative routes for nutrition.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.