Current medical management of patients with poor-risk metastatic germ-cell tumors

Curr Opin Urol. 2018 Sep;28(5):474-478. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000529.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Despite the high cure rate of germ-cell tumors (GCTs), the 5-year survival rate for those patients with metastatic poor-risk GCT rarely exceeds 50%. The purpose of this review is to highlight past and recent discoveries in the treatment of patients with poor-risk GCT.

Recent findings: Multiple clinical trials to optimize the management of poor-risk germ-cell cancer are ongoing. First-line phase II clinical trials of dose-dense multidrug and paclitaxel-based regimens such as accelerated bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP), dose-dense chemotherapy and paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) reported promising results. Positive phase III data are still lacking.

Summary: Four cycles of BEP or Etoposide (VP16), ifosfamide, cisplatin (VIP) continue to be the standard of care in patients with poor-risk GCT. A significant disparity in patient outcome exists between high-volume and low-volume centers. Referral for centers of excellence should be considered in the management of poor-risk GCT.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*
  • Bleomycin / therapeutic use
  • Cisplatin / administration & dosage
  • Cisplatin / therapeutic use
  • Etoposide / administration & dosage
  • Etoposide / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Ifosfamide / administration & dosage
  • Ifosfamide / therapeutic use
  • Male
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal / drug therapy*
  • Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal / secondary
  • Prognosis
  • Survival Rate
  • Taxoids / therapeutic use
  • Testicular Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Testicular Neoplasms / pathology

Substances

  • Taxoids
  • Bleomycin
  • Etoposide
  • Cisplatin
  • Ifosfamide

Supplementary concepts

  • BEP protocol
  • TIP regimen